Correlations among the astrometric data exist on several different levels, e.g.:

•
withinsource correlations (between the different astrometric parameters of the same source);

•
betweensource correlations (between the same astrometric parameter, e.g. parallax, for
different sources);

•
general correlations (between arbitrary astrometric parameters of different sources).
Withinsource correlations are always provided, when relevant, in the Gaia Archive. They are
estimated from the $5\times 5$ normal matrix of the individual sources. Because they are
computed by neglecting the betweensource correlations, they are only approximations of
the actual withinsource correlations, but probably sufficiently good for all astrophysical
applications. They are principally needed when transforming the five astrometric parameters
to other representations (e.g. calculation of galactic coordinates, tangential velocity, or
epoch transformation).
Betweensource correlations are important when calculating quantities that depend on
several sources, such as the mean parallax or internal kinematics of a stellar cluster.
In the final Gaia data such correlations are expected to be important mainly on small angular
scales (less than a few degrees), but in Gaia DR2 they could exist on much larger angular
scales (tens of degrees).
Betweensource correlations and general correlations are much harder to estimate than
the withinsource correlations, principally because their rigorous calculation would
involve the inversion of extremely large matrices.
Approximate methods to estimate general correlations exist
(e.g. Holl and Lindegren 2012; Holl et al. 2012) but have not been
implemented in the Gaia data processing. Empirically, the betweensource correlations
can be estimated by analysing the spatial correlations of the astrometric residuals, or
from statistical analysis of the parallaxes and proper motions for distinct groups of
sources, such as in stellar clusters and quasars. For Gaia DR2 the betweensource
correlations have not been extensively studied but they are believed to be very significant
and arising mainly from modelling errors in the attitude or instrument. A limited
correlation study of the astrometric residuals in Gaia DR2 is reported in Section 5.4
of Lindegren et al. (2018).